Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

    Originally posted by joecct View Post
    And there is the trouble - engineers and scientists should be running manufacturing corporations, not bean counters or liberal arts majors.
    Wrong.
    **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

    Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
    Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

    Comment


    • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

      In any case, the people running big corporations today are politicians. Their resumes may say "PhD" or "MBA," but their job skills are political -- grab and grin, speak platitude to power, use and be useful. That's why it isn't that ridiculous when CEOs move from, say, car companies to toiletries. They don't need to know anything about the science or production of their products, they just have to be trusted by the people that they lie to -- the same skill that makes pols succeed.
      Cornell University
      National Champion 1967, 1970
      ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
      Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

      Comment


      • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

        Originally posted by Kepler View Post
        In any case, the people running big corporations today are politicians. Their resumes may say "PhD" or "MBA," but their job skills are political -- grab and grin, speak platitude to power, use and be useful. That's why it isn't that ridiculous when CEOs move from, say, car companies to toiletries. They don't need to know anything about the science or production of their products, they just have to be trusted by the people that they lie to -- the same skill that makes pols succeed.
        Correct. Who knew years ago when you played Dungeons and Dragons that in real life the Charisma score was the most important?
        **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

        Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
        Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

        Comment


        • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

          Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
          Correct. Who knew years ago when you played Dungeons and Dragons that in real life the Charisma score was the most important?
          Charisma?
          Cornell University
          National Champion 1967, 1970
          ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
          Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

          Comment


          • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

            Originally posted by Kepler View Post
            Charisma measures a character’s force of personality, persuasiveness, personal magnetism, ability to lead, and physical attractiveness. This ability represents actual strength of personality, not merely how one is perceived by others in a social setting. Charisma is most important for paladins, sorcerers, and bards. It is also important for clerics, since it affects their ability to turn undead. Every creature has a Charisma score.

            http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/SRD:Charisma
            **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

            Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
            Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
              Wrong.
              Right - see Chrysler in the 60's. Once known for how well their cars were made and designed; The minute the marketing people started making decisions, spin crash burn.
              CCT '77 & '78
              4 kids
              5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
              1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)

              ”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
              - Benjamin Franklin

              Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).

              I want to live forever. So far, so good.

              Comment


              • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                Originally posted by joecct View Post
                Right - see Chrysler in the 60's. Once known for how well their cars were made and designed; The minute the marketing people started making decisions, spin crash burn.
                Irrelevant in today's lawyer/stock price based world.
                **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                Comment


                • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                  Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                  Not sure if joking. Are you really not aware that GS majors are getting hired by Big Corporate as HR troubleshooters and legal advisors at salaries that would give science and tech grads a boner?

                  American Studies majors -- poor and struggling.

                  Gender Studies majors -- hand-wringing all the way to the bank, and on their way to running P&G.
                  I'm curious - is this anecdotal and individual, or aggregate and reported? Or, what are the comparative placement rates and average starting salaries, if known? (I know lawyers and psychologists have been in trouble, job market-wise, but not sure about HR people etc.)
                  Huskies are very intelligent and trainable. Huskies make an excellent jogging companion, as long as it is not too hot. Grooming is minimal; bathing is normally unnecessary.
                  USCHO Fantasy Baseball Champion 2011 2013 2015

                  Comment


                  • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                    Originally posted by geezer View Post
                    I'm curious - is this anecdotal and individual, or aggregate and reported? Or, what are the comparative placement rates and average starting salaries, if known? (I know lawyers and psychologists have been in trouble, job market-wise, but not sure about HR people etc.)
                    Only the ones with low Charisma scores are in trouble.
                    **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                    Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                    Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                    Comment


                    • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                      Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
                      Only the ones with low Charisma scores are in trouble.
                      Shoot, that would be me then. Should've learned physics.
                      Huskies are very intelligent and trainable. Huskies make an excellent jogging companion, as long as it is not too hot. Grooming is minimal; bathing is normally unnecessary.
                      USCHO Fantasy Baseball Champion 2011 2013 2015

                      Comment


                      • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                        Originally posted by geezer View Post
                        I'm curious - is this anecdotal and individual, or aggregate and reported? Or, what are the comparative placement rates and average starting salaries, if known? (I know lawyers and psychologists have been in trouble, job market-wise, but not sure about HR people etc.)
                        It's pure anecdotal, and it actually started out as a kind of a joke. Point is that if you want to go for a poverty-inducing major "Gender Studies" is a bad choice, especially when you can always pick on good old "English."
                        Cornell University
                        National Champion 1967, 1970
                        ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                        Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                        Comment


                        • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                          Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                          you can always pick on good old "English."
                          Huskies are very intelligent and trainable. Huskies make an excellent jogging companion, as long as it is not too hot. Grooming is minimal; bathing is normally unnecessary.
                          USCHO Fantasy Baseball Champion 2011 2013 2015

                          Comment


                          • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                            Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                            It's pure anecdotal, and it actually started out as a kind of a joke. Point is that if you want to go for a poverty-inducing major "Gender Studies" is a bad choice, especially when you can always pick on good old "English."
                            There are plenty of fields where English majors can excel, they just don't happen to appeal to most English majors. The real problem majors are the philosophy and psychology students. Psychology isn't worth a thing unless you're getting a master's or PhD; philophy majors are just worthless no matter what.
                            "The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." George Orwell, 1984

                            "One does not simply walk into Mordor. Its Black Gates are guarded by more than just Orcs. There is evil there that does not sleep, and the Great Eye is ever watchful. It is a barren wasteland, riddled with fire and ash and dust, the very air you breathe is a poisonous fume." Boromir

                            "Good news! We have a delivery." Professor Farnsworth

                            Comment


                            • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                              Originally posted by St. Clown View Post
                              There are plenty of fields where English majors can excel, they just don't happen to appeal to most English majors. The real problem majors are the philosophy and psychology students. Psychology isn't worth a thing unless you're getting a master's or PhD; philophy majors are just worthless no matter what.
                              Only to the degree that education is animal training. If you view education as gaining concrete trade skills such as programming or roofing or recombining DNA, then you are correct. If you view education as allowing the deepest intellectual development within the broadest possible abstract intellectual experiences, then studies like philosophy, literature and music are still and likely always will be the top of the food chain (theology was once right up there too). I don't necessarily mean university studies, because universities have been on the path to being wholly-owned subsidiaries of business for generations and at this point are basically factories turning out production units: the little that's left of the Humanities mostly prepares one to be a member of... a Humanities faculty.
                              Cornell University
                              National Champion 1967, 1970
                              ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                              Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                              Comment


                              • Re: 2nd Term Part VIII - The Thin Red Line

                                Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                                Only to the degree that education is animal training. If you view education as gaining concrete trade skills such as programming or roofing or recombining DNA, then you are correct. If you view education as allowing the deepest intellectual development within the broadest possible abstract intellectual experiences, then studies like philosophy, literature and music are still and likely always will be the top of the food chain (theology was once right up there too). I don't necessarily mean university studies, because universities have been on the path to being wholly-owned subsidiaries of business for generations and at this point are basically factories turning out production units: the little that's left of the Humanities mostly prepares one to be a member of... a Humanities faculty.
                                The good old days are gone.
                                **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                                Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                                Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X