Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Tippsy,
I don't really think in the end that Wisconsin as a #5 overall will go to St Paul. No need for that. Lots of possibilities to fill the Xcel.
But as for your other point, I agree. The current thing with the 4 regions doesn't really work. St Paul works. Grand Forks would work, of NCAA was still ok with that. Denver hasn't worked. The Midwestern sites have been poor because there isn't enough close by interest in college hockey. Out east, Albany has had trouble. The rest I don't know about....
But I don't know what would be the best. There has been lots of discussion about it, and no real great answers that I can see.
I don't know anything about it, really, though. I have nothing to go on but numbers, because I don't really have an emotional connection to anyplace except Minnesota.
Originally posted by Tipsy McStagger
View Post
I don't really think in the end that Wisconsin as a #5 overall will go to St Paul. No need for that. Lots of possibilities to fill the Xcel.
But as for your other point, I agree. The current thing with the 4 regions doesn't really work. St Paul works. Grand Forks would work, of NCAA was still ok with that. Denver hasn't worked. The Midwestern sites have been poor because there isn't enough close by interest in college hockey. Out east, Albany has had trouble. The rest I don't know about....
But I don't know what would be the best. There has been lots of discussion about it, and no real great answers that I can see.
I don't know anything about it, really, though. I have nothing to go on but numbers, because I don't really have an emotional connection to anyplace except Minnesota.
Comment