Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

[Old Pio]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

As a physician i would be very interested in the post autopsy findings. Hopefully blood was sent for toxicology also. I would hope that this information is made public similar to all the other information that has been released by the media.

In the fullness of time, all information will come out. Perhaps not in time to balance the media-driven portrait of the "white hispanic," but it'll come out.

[DrDemento]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

In the fullness of time, all information will come out. Perhaps not in time to balance the media-driven portrait of the "white hispanic," but it'll come out.

I imagine we will eventually get the information at about the same time we see a picture of Trayvon that wasn't taken when he was about 12 years old.

[Old Pio]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

I imagine we will eventually get the information at about the same time we see a picture of Trayvon that wasn't taken when he was about 12 years old.

Good guess. Or that creepy, years old mug shot of Zimmerman.

I'll repost this, which describes the extent and nature of the exploitation of this case by the kid's parents and many others.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/...ondon-england/

[Old Pio]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

There's just no stopping the Obama campaign and willing Democrats in the House from their continuing efforts to politicize this case. It's imperative to get His Transcriptlessness re-elected. For those who don't know, Raul Grijalva makes Jane Fonda look like a redneck. Another one of Kepler's "moderates."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...von-amendment/

[Slap Shot]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

There's just no stopping the Obama campaign and willing Democrats in the House from their continuing efforts to politicize this case. It's imperative to get His Transcriptlessness re-elected. For those who don't know, Raul Grijalva makes Jane Fonda look like a redneck. Another one of Kepler's "moderates."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...von-amendment/

Where is Obama mentioned in the article? And the Times sure isn't "moderate".

[joecct]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

Where is Obama mentioned in the article? And the Times sure isn't "moderate".

The WashTimes is not, but some may consider Grijalva to be.

Obama is always an indirect reference.

[Old Pio]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

Where is Obama mentioned in the article? And the Times sure isn't "moderate".

Is it really necessary to spell it out for you? Surely you have some analytical ability. I mean, Trayvon looks like His Racistness' son, if he had one. In the interim, over a dozen white people have been beaten and assaulted by blacks in incidents where the attackers have made some reference to "Trayvon." From the White House? Crickets.

And from your perspective, the issue here is the editorial posture of the Washington Times, and not the White House and Democrat thugs in the House and shameless race pimps like the Revs politicizing this incident?

Florida is a swing state. Heavy black turnout very nearly won it and the presidency for Al Gore. So firing up the black base there isn't exactly rocket science. And the narrative of an out of control "white hispanic" racist gunning down innocent kids and their "skillets" fits His Wonderfulness' needs perfectly.

[Slap Shot]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

Is it really necessary to spell it out for you?

Save it. Your umbrage is lost on anyone with proper political scientific analyic skills.

[Old Pio]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

Save it. Your umbrage is lost on anyone with proper political scientific analyic skills.

I had an umbrage. I traded it in on a Volt. . .and a fire extinguisher.

[Bob Gray]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

Is it really necessary to spell it out for you?

It's not necessary because it doesn't work to spell things out for him. I've tried it, many times. Rarely does anything get through.

[Slap Shot]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

It's not necessary because it doesn't work to spell things out for him. I've tried it, many times. Rarely does anything get through.

Bob, the next time you provide an actual rebuttal rather than obfuscation to anything I've posted will be the first time. Have super day.

[Old Pio]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

Oops. The "he doesn't look hurt to me crowd" has some 'splaining to do. 'Course to some of 'em, it won't make any difference at all. The relevant datum is "skillets."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimm...ry?id=16353532

[duper]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

Oops. The "he doesn't look hurt to me crowd" has some 'splaining to do. 'Course to some of 'em, it won't make any difference at all. The relevant datum is "skillets."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimm...ry?id=16353532

No one should defend Trayvon Martin. He was obviously a wuss. I mean seriously, he brutally attacked a guy to the point where he feared for his life, and the best he could do was break his nose and put two cuts on the back of his head? What a pansy!

[Old Pio]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

No one should defend Trayvon Martin. He was obviously a wuss. I mean seriously, he brutally attacked a guy to the point where he feared for his life, and the best he could do was break his nose and put two cuts on the back of his head? What a pansy!

beatus interruptus.

[5mn_Major]

Re: Florida vs. Zimmerman - Q.E.D????????

No one should defend Trayvon Martin.

That's the simplicity of stand and defend. One side gets off and the other side doesn't exist anymore.