Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
User Profile
Collapse
-
By the way.....CC misses because they lost to Augustana on October 28. A bad loss. They would have been a #3 otherwise.
-
-
-
NOTE: The Committee is NOT allowed to do this under current rules, but it would be cool if the rules were amended one of 2 ways:
1) Amend the "No intraconference games in Round 1" rule to say...."No games in Round 1 between teams who have played each other since January 1"....
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Slightly different tack....
Nest year there is a regional in Toledo. Usually that is a mess for attendance. But with this year's PWR, it would be possible to have a Toledo Regional of:
Mich State v Western Michigan
Maine v Michigan
That would be as good as Toledo could...
Leave a comment:
-
As a reminder, there is absolutely nothing in the handbook that says anything about spreading teams from one conference to different regions. With all due respect, Mr MacInnes, for the role you have played in the development of our game, you can lobby for such a change in future years....
Leave a comment:
-
I agree with the idea of Maryland Heights having NoDak/Mich as well as Mich State/West Mich. That looks like a good "Western" area regional.
In a vacuum, I agree that the lowest #1 (MSU) should play in Springfield. But this isn't happening in a vacuum. BU already has to go...
Leave a comment:
-
Here is the way I would think about it.....
Providence: BC v MTU and Wisc v Quinn. This is perfect. No need to change. Near home teams in both semi finals. And, 1, 8, 9, 16
Springfield: UMass is host, and as a 14 seed both CAN'T play BU and shouldn't play the 2 seed anyway....
Leave a comment:
No activity results to display
Show More
Leave a comment: