PDA

View Full Version : UMD @ Wisconsin 10/31-11/1; the third side of the triangle


Pages : [1] 2 3 4

ARM
10-27-2008, 12:51 PM
Minnesota holds the upper hand against UMD, Wisconsin dominates Minnesota, but at least last season, UMD does the same to the Badgers. Does that third trend continue into 2008-2009 like the first two?

Jessie Vetter played as well on Friday as I've ever seen her play. Wisconsin bludgeoned opponents through their first four weeks of play, and responded to the first challenge they faced with an impressive third period.

Meanwhile, the Bulldogs have staggered around like they are still suffering from a triple-championship-induced hangover. Kim Martin looks mortal. Their offense has disappeared for long stretches.

This leaves me to conclude that there is only one possible outcome for the series this weekend -- UMD wins it. They'll probably look over matched much of the time, playing some Ali-esque rope-a-dope style that will trick the Badgers into losing their focus like a proverbial hare. The 'Dogs might only play a couple minutes of actual hockey in each game, opting for a pro-wrestling style sideshow that will have the crowd guffawing, the referees distracted, and critics of black comedy penning rave reviews. Like the villains among those grapplers, they'll probably cheat to win. But win they will, because this is the act of the play where evil appears ready to triumph over good. So I predict UMD wins on points, 4-1, because I've seen this trick last season, versus both the Badgers and Wildcats. And given the way that visual evidence of the NCAA win over UNH mysteriously disappeared, security at the Kohl Center might want to check Coach Miller for a concealed magnet capable of erasing electromagnetic data as she enters the building.

(* NOTE: The preceding paragraph is not an actual hockey prediction. Neither is it the opinion of the paragraph's author that Shannon Miller is an actual villain, rather she just plays one in WCHA arenas. *)

brookyone
10-27-2008, 02:42 PM
Minnesota holds the upper hand against UMD, Wisconsin dominates Minnesota, but at least last season, UMD does the same to the Badgers. Does that third trend continue into 2008-2009 like the first two?
My gut feeling is this angle of the triangle is going to collapse this season.

If the entire trend were to repeat itself in identical fashion for a 2nd consecutive season...that would be a little freaky wouldn't it?. Doesn't mean it couldn't happen. :confused:

I don't want to detract from the topic of this thread...but either way, there are the makings for some very interesting rematches at Ridder

leafsfan
10-27-2008, 03:50 PM
My gut feeling is this angle of the triangle is going to collapse this season.

If the entire trend were to repeat itself in identical fashion for a 2nd consecutive season...that would be a little freaky wouldn't it?. Doesn't mean it couldn't happen. :confused:

I don't want to detract from the topic of this thread...but either way, there are the makings for some very interesting rematches at Ridder

Is the stat on the WCHA website correct? Irwin for UMD has "0" goals....

Is she hurt? Or just off to a slow start?

I would think that's a big part of there sluggish offensive output so far this year.

brookyone
10-27-2008, 04:03 PM
Is the stat on the WCHA website correct? Irwin for UMD has "0" goals....

Is she hurt? Or just off to a slow start?

I would think that's a big part of there sluggish offensive output so far this year.
She was in the lineup both games vs. Minnesota at the DECC. Slow start could be the best explanation. If she's not 100% I don't know about it.

Dogs97
10-27-2008, 04:57 PM
Is the stat on the WCHA website correct? Irwin for UMD has "0" goals....

Is she hurt? Or just off to a slow start?

I would think that's a big part of there sluggish offensive output so far this year.



Yes that stat is correct. I agree that it is a very large contributing factor to the sluggish offensive output. She's getting great chances just not putting the puck in the back of the net quite yet. Little slump no big deal just yet but if it is still like this at the mid-way point in the season then I might start to worry.

leafsfan
10-27-2008, 05:04 PM
Yes that stat is correct. I agree that it is a very large contributing factor to the sluggish offensive output. She's getting great chances just not putting the puck in the back of the net quite yet. Little slump no big deal just yet but if it is still like this at the mid-way point in the season then I might start to worry.

Goals are like grapes, they come in bunches..............

ARM
10-31-2008, 03:15 PM
Badgers Deluce gets the first penalty 25 seconds in, but the 'Dogs do not capitalize on the PP.

BadgerFan11
10-31-2008, 03:20 PM
Badgers Deluce gets the first penalty 25 seconds in, but the 'Dogs do not capitalize on the PP.

is there a webcast or live stats site for these games?

ARM
10-31-2008, 03:25 PM
is there a webcast or live stats site for these games?Yes. The live stats is here (http://www.uwbadgers.com/live/whky/livestatsL.html).

I'm too lazy to find the link for the webcast, but you can get to it from uwbadgers.com.

ARM
10-31-2008, 03:29 PM
I guess the webcast is here (http://uwbadgers.com/audio_video/stream/?eventid=6322&type=w).

ARM
10-31-2008, 03:39 PM
The goalies > the skaters after the first 20.

shots are 10/7 in favor of UMD

ARM
10-31-2008, 03:56 PM
UMD 1, UW 0

Touminen

Charlie Jig
10-31-2008, 04:03 PM
UMD 1 - UW -1 (Lawler)
13:42 remaining in second period

ARM
10-31-2008, 04:07 PM
I can relate to your :( when the 'Dogs were ahead, but this is one of those rare days in the season where it is probably better for the Gophs if UMD wins. :eek:

ARM
10-31-2008, 04:10 PM
2-1 UW. Ammerman on the PP.

Charlie Jig
10-31-2008, 04:19 PM
I can relate to your :( when the 'Dogs were ahead, but this is one of those rare days in the season where it is probably better for the Gophs if UMD wins. :eek:


:eek: is right!

ARM
10-31-2008, 04:22 PM
Still 2-1 after 2. Shots 20-16 for UW.

ARM
10-31-2008, 05:05 PM
That's how game 1 ends -- 2-1 for UW.

D2D
10-31-2008, 05:14 PM
That's how game 1 ends -- 2-1 for UW.

Looks like the triangle is being reshaped, from equilateral to obtuse, and the Bulldogs acutely need a win tomorrow. ;)

WHKY blogger
10-31-2008, 06:01 PM
Obviously always happy with the Win, especially when its over UMD.

I really wondered after the disallowed goal and then UMD scoring first if it just wasn't the badgers day.

The Greatest One proved otherwise! :D

Both teams looked a bit flat to start the game and the 3rd Period. The fire just didn't seem to be there, which could be atributed to the early start time (however with the 11am start time tomorrow :mad: :mad: ) it eliminates the 8 hour or less turnaround.

I don't think either team played its best today. Both have many more tricks in their bag then they revealed. I know its still early in the year, but I sort of expect more when watching a game between UM-UMD-UW.

Really starting to like how the UW line combos are jelled. Especially the 3rd-4th lines who could easily compete with some teams 1st-2nd lines.....

I don't think I need to say anything about the Greatest Ones Line! or the Duggan Line.

Hopefully the "A" game is brought to to the table tomorrow, and the Badgers emerge with a home Sweep!