Division III Rutter Computer Ranking Top Ten for Monday, November 26th

[LakersFan]

Rutter Division III Women's Ice Hockey Computer Ranking Top Ten

Through Games of Sunday, November 25th

Rating is based on wins, loses, and ties only. Margin of victory and game location are not included in the rating. A team's rating from the previous year is used as an initial weight using a Bayesian approach.

Rank Team Rating Previous Record
1 Plattsburgh 2.8329 1 7-1-0
2 Saint Anselm 2.6675 3 3-0-0
3 Wis-Stevens Pt. 2.5249 2 5-0-0
4 RIT 2.2883 5 6-0-0
5 Middlebury 2.2681 4 3-1-0
6 Gustavus Adolphus 2.1979 6 4-1-0
7 Manhattanville 2.0654 9 3-2-0
8 Elmira 1.5758 8 5-1-0
9 Amherst 1.5528 7 3-0-1
10 Wis-Superior 1.2340 10 5-1-0

Dropped: None

For more information, visit http://math.bd.psu.edu/faculty/rutter/D3_Rankings.html

Copyright 2007 Michael A. Rutter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

[hawkhockey15]

Are those records for this year? If so, Saint Anselm's is wrong. They are currently 3-0-0.

[OneTimer]

Hey HawkHockey - stop pumping your team so much. their rankings are so meaningless

[carveman]

Hey HawkHockey - stop pumping your team so much. their rankings are so meaningless

And your problem with a simple statement of fact is what?
Sounds like you have one of two things going on: either your team isn't doing well enough to be "pumped" about, or you need to FIND a team to be pumped about.
Good on hawkhockey15 for stepping up for his/her team.

[Say What?]

Rutter Division III Women's Ice Hockey Computer Ranking Top Ten

Through Games of Sunday, November 25th

Rating is based on wins, loses, and ties only. Margin of victory and game location are not included in the rating. A team's rating from the previous year is used as an initial weight using a Bayesian approach.

Rank Team Rating Previous Record
1 Plattsburgh 2.8329 1 7-1-0
2 Saint Anselm 2.6675 3 3-3-0
3 Wis-Stevens Pt. 2.5249 2 5-0-0
4 RIT 2.2883 5 6-0-0
5 Middlebury 2.2681 4 3-1-0
6 Gustavus Adolphus 2.1979 6 4-1-0
7 Manhattanville 2.0654 9 3-2-0
8 Elmira 1.5758 8 5-1-0
9 Amherst 1.5528 7 3-0-1
10 Wis-Superior 1.2340 10 5-1-0

Dropped: None

For more information, visit http://math.bd.psu.edu/faculty/rutter/D3_Rankings.html

Copyright 2007 Michael A. Rutter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/; or, (b) send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 2nd Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

If I go to the listed website, the RPI page has been updated as it includes Concordia (WI) and Adrianne. However your Rutter Computer ranking top ten does not agree to what is listed here. The Rutter ranking page indicates updated through 11/25/07 but the heading indicates for the season 2006-2007 which leads me to the conclusion that this page has not been updated. Which listing in fact is correct? As always, thanks for your data!!:)

[aerogroup2]

USCHO Poll for Nov 26th

November 26, 2007
Team (First Place Votes) Record Points Last Poll
1 Plattsburgh ( 7) 7-1-0 138 1
2 Middlebury ( 4) 3-1-0 134 2
3 Wis.-Stevens Point ( 3) 5-0-0 123 3
4 RIT ( 1) 6-0-0 82 5
5 Elmira 5-1-0 81 5
5 Manhattanville 3-2-0 81 8
7 Amherst 3-0-1 78 4
8 Gustavus Adolphus 4-1-0 61 7
9 Wis.-Superior 5-1-0 26 9
10 Wis.-River Falls 2-2-0 9 NR
Others Receiving Votes: Adrian 7, Utica 3, Lake Forest 1, Trinity 1

[LakersFan]

hawkhockey15: Thanks for pointing out the typo. I have fixed it.

Say What?: I can't seem to find 2006-2007 anywhere on my website. And I am pretty sure what I have in my post matches my rankings. I do not include RPI here, so that could be the difference. Any further information would be helpful.

[Say What?]

hawkhockey15: Thanks for pointing out the typo. I have fixed it.

Say What?: I can't seem to find 2006-2007 anywhere on my website. And I am pretty sure what I have in my post matches my rankings. I do not include RPI here, so that could be the difference. Any further information would be helpful.

If I click on "http://math.bd.psu.edu/faculty/rutter/D3_Rankings.html" in your post, the heading to the page that comes up is "2006-2007 Division III Women's College Hockey Ratings" followed by a couple paragraphs. Then it states "Current Rutter Computer Rankings"followed by "For games played through 11/25/2007". The table that follows has 45 teams which exclude Norwich, Concordia (WI) and Adrianne. The first 10 teams and their ratings are :

Team Rating RPI.Rank RPI
1 Plattsburgh 3.0139 1 0.6646
2 Middlebury 2.0753 2 0.6381
3 Gustavus Adolphus 2.0744 3 0.6323
4 Elmira 1.8673 7 0.6002
5 Saint Anselm 1.7501 5 0.6063
6 RIT 1.5787 4 0.6082
7 Utica 1.5258 12 0.5834
8 Manhattanville 1.4978 11 0.5843
9 Wis-Stevens Pt. 1.4409 6 0.6007
10 Amherst 1.4148 9 0.5946

I'm betting that these are last years ending Ratings. After the table is the RPI section which if the path is followed leads to a table with all 48 teams included and different RPI numbers than above but which agree to your original post. For me, anyway, the link to the "Current Rutter Computer Rankings" does not work. Does that explain my dilemma? Thanks again.

[Tweedle Dee]

USCHO Poll for Nov 26th

November 26, 2007
Team (First Place Votes) Record Points Last Poll
1 Plattsburgh ( 7) 7-1-0 138 1
2 Middlebury ( 4) 3-1-0 134 2
3 Wis.-Stevens Point ( 3) 5-0-0 123 3
4 RIT ( 1) 6-0-0 82 5
5 Elmira 5-1-0 81 5
5 Manhattanville 3-2-0 81 8
7 Amherst 3-0-1 78 4
8 Gustavus Adolphus 4-1-0 61 7
9 Wis.-Superior 5-1-0 26 9
10 Wis.-River Falls 2-2-0 9 NR
Others Receiving Votes: Adrian 7, Utica 3, Lake Forest 1, Trinity 1

I'll go by these rankings and no others thank you.