Gophers: Under or Over Achievers?

[siouxinminny]

Had enough of the Gopartisans making excuses for their team this year? Vote in our scientific, MIT-endorsed, definitive poll on the subject.

[ScoobyDoo]

Originally posted by siouxinminny
Had enough of the Gopartisans making excuses for their team this year? Vote in our scientific, MIT-endorsed, definitive poll on the subject.
I didn't make any excuses.

[Slap Shot]

siouxinminny, something tells me you wouldn't even be a college hockey fan if the Gophers didn't have a team.

[siouxinminny]

Originally posted by Slap Shot
siouxinminny, something tells me you wouldn't even be a college hockey fan if the Gophers didn't have a team.

Hopefully, they will have one next year ...

:p

[LordViperScorpion]

Originally posted by siouxinminny
Had enough of the Gopartisans making excuses for their team this year? Vote in our scientific, MIT-endorsed, definitive poll on the subject.

Differing to the postseason as a true measure of success in a hockey season is not making excuses, it is simply prudence.

That said, I voted for underachieving. As expectations were set, they should have won the WCHA regular season. They have underachieved to this point, but two more important goals remain viably attainable.

[state of hockey]

Pretty dumb poll. If they got anything other that 1st (which is what happened) no one would have any choice but to say underacheiving.